Finally, the cabinet
has approved revival of a sinking ship that is Scooters India (SIL). The government would put Rs 200
crores to revive the company. That means a part of the hard earned money form
disinvestment and spectrum sales would be invested in a dying company.
It showed some seriousness in September to bring down fiscal deficit in. In February it forgot the responsibility! Since 2002-03 the SIL is making losses. Hence in March2009, it was declared sick.Why this inconsistent behavior of government?
It showed some seriousness in September to bring down fiscal deficit in. In February it forgot the responsibility! Since 2002-03 the SIL is making losses. Hence in March2009, it was declared sick.Why this inconsistent behavior of government?
Further, it is believed that
Air India is asking money form the government. Government biggies like Air India,
BSNL, MTNL are running losses. Yet the government wants to infuse life to these
companies by throwing public money. Why does government want to do it?
Why is government competing
with private players to produce the (private) goods that the private sector can
happily supply at a competitive price?
Whose interests does it serve? Simply, it is bad economics combined with vote-bank
politics. What is surprising is that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh is keen to revive this company.
See my earlier posts (here
here)
on why we should not bail out Air India and why the government should stay away
from telecom business.
It is worth asking what is the
role of government, in today’s world? It should create a conducive atmosphere
favorable to the private sector. A business friendly environment where private
sector can grow hassle-free. That means the government should provide basic necessary
infrastructure goods where it is under-supplied by the private sector. Furthre,
government should also provide merit goods like welfare schemes since a major section
of the population live below poverty line. In these cases if the government ruins
on deficits (fiscal deficit) it is justified. The argument for deficit is
justified when investment in such projects lead to rise in capacity addition
and raises productivity. See this excellent
post
by Rajan.
So, what message does it convey?
It is not serious in bringing down fiscal deficit. Remember that RBI’s policy
rates are conditional upon how serious is the government in correcting its fiscal
disorder. Such half-hearted efforts at reducing fiscal deficit may provide a
wrong signal to the RBI. Further, if agents (household) are rational then it would get reflected in higher
inflationary expectations which is
again, key to central bank’s policy moves.
Please somebody tell the government
not to pursue such bad economic decisions. Should somebody remind the government
that it better serves the people by providing an enabling atmosphere where
private sector can grow.
No comments:
Post a Comment