Everybody is commenting on
India’s onion price rise. The pseudo-economist in me also urged me to comment
something. So, my two cents are here.
Onion always brings tears
to our eyes: When its price rises it brings tears, when its price falls, it
also brings tears. So, this time when price of onion rose to Rs 61/KG, government
again blamed onion hoarders and bad monsoon. It is not new thing to read
government blaming price rise of vegetables to hoarders. As usual, it is believed that government also
ordered raids on godowns where vegetables are stored.
The questions are:
1. Is
it a demand-supply mismatch?
2. Is
it due to bad monsoon?
3. Is
it the hoarder, the bad guy?
4. Finally,
is it the government policy like no MSP for onion and no cold storage for
vegetables?
This Wall
Street Journal piece made me little uncomfortable in digesting the cause
and remedial measures. For the uninitiated, without reading you can guess
correctly what the article is arguing. Because the name WSJ itself is sufficient.
They will say hoarders are not responsible, it the mistake of market (I mean,
the demand-supply mismatch) and let the government watch the situation and let the
market take care of onion price rise. Well, they say that bad monsoon and
market speculations are also partly responsible. They say:
Of course, weather and market speculation play a part but the fundamental
issue is a supply and demand mismatch that is causing the volatility, not an
onion mafia. Demand for onions is rising along with the incomes of the average
Indian. But farmers are discouraged from growing enough onions because of
government interventions aimed at keeping prices down.
Hmm…..that is okay. But
then they quote this:
When onion prices rise, the
government steps in to block profitable exports and to knock down domestic
prices, said Changdev Holkar, former director of the state-run National
Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India Ltd.
I have a little problem here.
If you analyze two statements here you see they talk about demand-supply
mismatch and profitable exports. By profitable exports they mean export price
has risen. Thus, the question is which demand-supply mismatch they are talking
about: India or Global? I think it is pretty clear that they are talking global
demand-supply mismatch. If this is so, then global demand-supply mismatch should
be blamed for domestic demand-supply mismatch. Think of this. Suppose the
demand = supply in the domestic market. But global demand > global supply.
As a result, global price rises. Seeing higher price and higher profitable
opportunities, domestic (Indian) producers, read TRADERS, will export more. And
this will cause a domestic demand-supply imbalance. If this argument is right, then
I think banning exports is a solution in right direction. Another way to think
is when domestic price is rising why are they still selling in foreign market
or exporting? Obviously, the export price is higher (marginally or substantially?)
than domestic price. Else, they won’t export, right? If you ban exports, then traders
cry foul.
The other non-trivial
question is: what kind of good is onion (from a microeconomics point of view):
Normal, or inferior?
When import price becomes
cheap, why do domestic corporates cry foul and urge government to ban imports
or raise import prices? Why do they do that?
If due to global demand-supply mismatch (demand > supply) domestic consumers
has to pay a higher price, then why do they complain when global demand-supply
mismatch (supply > demand) results global price plummet and consumers also
want to benefit from that? Why don’t you advise government then to tie its hand
and let the market do the job?
It also argues for MSP for
onion. Though, I have sympathy for this suggestion, yet the pricing or MSP
hikes become more political. Some economists squarely blame food inflation to
MSP hikes. They argue MSP hikes are not correlated with cost hikes and is is
motivated by election. Thus, when there is a growing demand for MSP abolition
of certain commodities, to what extent this suggestion (MSP for onion) makes
sense has to be evaluated carefully. I leave it to you.
No comments:
Post a Comment